Timeline Sandbox

Conversation

Recent posts in reply to #z4hlt4a

@prologic@twtxt.net

That's kind of weird actually. Hmmm @movq, @lyse, and @bender are all cool 😎

In reply to: #z4hlt4a 11 months ago
@prologic@twtxt.net

Whereas @movq @lyse and @bender are all cool 😎

In reply to: #z4hlt4a 11 months ago
@prologic@twtxt.net

I'll see if I can fix this and write a test case for what's going on here. I think this is made difficult now because folks like @eapl.me decide that it's okay to have a . (period) in their # nick 🤣 tbh I think nick(s) should have rules of what they can and cannot be comprised of. i.e: no punctuation 🤦‍♂️

In reply to: #z4hlt4a 11 months ago
@prologic@twtxt.net

There are 5 of such "Twters" on this pod that have periods in their nick 😢

sqlite> select count(distinct(nick)) from twters where nick like '%.%';
count(distinct(nick)) = 5
sqlite> select distinct(nick) from twters where nick like '%.%';
 nick = @marado@ciberlandia.pt

 nick = eapl.me

 nick = eapl.mx

 nick = grumpygordie.great-site.net

 nick = @chyrp.doesnm.cc
In reply to: #z4hlt4a 11 months ago
@prologic@twtxt.net

@bender I can fix and make that work in the parser too. But I'm no longer sure how to cater for the general case. It's too much to support all punctuation whilst at the same time as other contradicting rules. For example you cannot both support . in nicknames and then expect to be able to to end a mention with a . 🤦‍♂️

In reply to: #z4hlt4a 11 months ago
@prologic@twtxt.net

@bender I believe that's the only way. We'll deal with it as it comes up I think.

In reply to: #z4hlt4a 11 months ago
@prologic@twtxt.net

This is fixed now 🥳 Thanks @xuu!

In reply to: #z4hlt4a 11 months ago
@prologic@twtxt.net

@bmallred Nice! 👌

In reply to: #z4hlt4a 11 months ago
Comment via email