Timeline Sandbox

Conversation

Recent posts in reply to #z4hlt4a

@prologic@twtxt.net

That's kind of weird actually. Hmmm @movq, @lyse, and @bender are all cool 😎

In reply to: #z4hlt4a 1 year ago
@prologic@twtxt.net

Whereas @movq @lyse and @bender are all cool 😎

In reply to: #z4hlt4a 1 year ago
@prologic@twtxt.net

I'll see if I can fix this and write a test case for what's going on here. I think this is made difficult now because folks like @eapl.me decide that it's okay to have a . (period) in their # nick 🤣 tbh I think nick(s) should have rules of what they can and cannot be comprised of. i.e: no punctuation 🤦‍♂️

In reply to: #z4hlt4a 1 year ago
@prologic@twtxt.net

There are 5 of such "Twters" on this pod that have periods in their nick 😢

sqlite> select count(distinct(nick)) from twters where nick like '%.%';
count(distinct(nick)) = 5
sqlite> select distinct(nick) from twters where nick like '%.%';
 nick = @marado@ciberlandia.pt

 nick = eapl.me

 nick = eapl.mx

 nick = grumpygordie.great-site.net

 nick = @chyrp.doesnm.cc
In reply to: #z4hlt4a 1 year ago
@prologic@twtxt.net

@bender I can fix and make that work in the parser too. But I'm no longer sure how to cater for the general case. It's too much to support all punctuation whilst at the same time as other contradicting rules. For example you cannot both support . in nicknames and then expect to be able to to end a mention with a . 🤦‍♂️

In reply to: #z4hlt4a 1 year ago
@prologic@twtxt.net

@bender I believe that's the only way. We'll deal with it as it comes up I think.

In reply to: #z4hlt4a 1 year ago
@prologic@twtxt.net

This is fixed now 🥳 Thanks @xuu!

In reply to: #z4hlt4a 1 year ago
@prologic@twtxt.net

@bmallred Nice! 👌

In reply to: #z4hlt4a 1 year ago
Comment via email